Major social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit are restricting access to posts about the Gaza and Ukraine conflicts as part of efforts to comply with the UK’s newly enforced Online Safety Act. While the law aims to protect minors from harmful online content such as pornography and posts promoting self-harm or violence, it has sparked concern for potentially stifling public discourse.
BBC Verify’s investigation revealed that age-unverified users are blocked from viewing certain war-related posts—even if the content contains no graphic imagery. Parliamentary speeches and historical art have also faced restrictions, raising questions about over-enforcement.
Technology experts like Prof. Sandra Wachter from Oxford University argue that this law wasn’t meant to silence discussions of public importance. Other professionals, such as Prof. Sonia Livingstone from LSE, caution that while protection of children is vital, platforms must improve their moderation to avoid excessive censorship.
The law mandates platforms to enforce age verification and can fine companies up to £18 million or 10% of their global revenue for non-compliance. However, concerns grow that over-application may limit adult users' access to factual information—especially as millions browse these platforms without logging in.
Critics, including Elon Musk, suggest the Act may be misused to control public opinion rather than protect youth. Meanwhile, UK regulators insist platforms must apply the rules responsibly without hindering political debate or freedom of expression.
❓Question
Do you think social media platforms should block sensitive war content to protect children, even if it limits adult access to vital information?
Tags
securety