🇺🇸 A Surprise Twist in the Shutdown Showdown
In a dramatic turn on Capitol Hill, eight Democratic senators — including one independent — voted with Republicans to pass a deal reopening the U.S. government.
The decision ended weeks of deadlock, marking a rare moment of bipartisanship amid fierce division over healthcare funding and federal worker pay.
 |
| 8 Democrats Who Backed the GOP Shutdown Deal — And Why Their Move Shocked Washington |
For much of the shutdown, Democrats refused to support any agreement that didn’t include an extension of healthcare subsidies, warning that millions of Americans would otherwise face higher costs.
But as public frustration and economic pressure mounted, a small group of Democrats broke ranks — each for their own reasons.
🧩 Tim Kaine (Virginia): Putting Workers First
Former vice-presidential candidate Tim Kaine said his “yes” vote was driven by a duty to protect federal workers.
Virginia, home to over 300,000 government employees, was deeply affected by the shutdown.
“This bill restores back pay, reinstates wrongfully fired staff, and ensures federal employees are treated fairly,” Kaine explained, referencing worker protections he helped pass in 2019.
💬 Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire): Ending the Suffering
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a key architect of the bipartisan deal, described it as essential to restoring “a functioning, cross-party budget process.”
She emphasized that the bill supports veteran healthcare and food assistance programs, saying delays would “only prolong Americans’ pain.”
 |
| 8 Democrats Who Backed the GOP Shutdown Deal — And Why Their Move Shocked Washington |
🩺 Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire): A Vote for Humanity
Fellow New Hampshire senator Maggie Hassan called her decision both “morally urgent and practical.”
She highlighted the need for a functioning government that supports children, seniors, and essential workers, saying:
“Our veterans deserve protection, our air traffic controllers deserve rest, and our families deserve stability.”
🍞 Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada): A Vote Against Suffering
Nevada’s Catherine Cortez Masto said she had voted “more than a dozen times” to end the shutdown, citing the growing hardship in her state.
“We saw food bank lines like during the pandemic. It was heartbreaking to watch,” she said.
🏛️ John Fetterman (Pennsylvania): The People First
Senator John Fetterman reaffirmed his centrist stance, voting to reopen the government after 40 days of gridlock.
“This should never have happened. Our troops, SNAP families, and Capitol Police deserve better,” he said.
Fetterman framed the shutdown as a “failure of leadership” across both parties.
💵 Jacky Rosen (Nevada): Fighting for Healthcare Stability
Jacky Rosen surprised observers by breaking from the Democratic bloc after Nevada’s governor urged bipartisan action.
She justified her vote as a tactical win:
“This deal guarantees a December vote on extending the Affordable Care Act tax credits — a lifeline for millions.”
That promise was a key concession Republicans offered to secure Democratic support.
🧠 Dick Durbin (Illinois): Leadership with Conscience
Long-time Senate leader Dick Durbin, who plans to retire next year, also crossed the aisle.
Calling the deal “imperfect but necessary,” he said it eased “the shutdown’s hurt” and secured Democratic wins like healthcare funding protections.
“It’s time for the promised vote on the ACA tax credits,” Durbin added.
🤝 Angus King (Maine – Independent): Building Bridges
Independent senator Angus King, who caucuses with Democrats, helped negotiate the final deal.
“We’re closer to securing healthcare tax credits than we’ve been in months,” he said, calling the compromise “a win for the American people.”
Known for his bipartisan approach, King’s involvement proved crucial in breaking the stalemate.
🧭 What This Vote Really Means
The defections may have ended the shutdown, but they also exposed growing fractures within the Democratic Party.
While some Democrats prioritize policy wins like healthcare funding, others emphasize governance and stability over political symbolism.
Political analysts say the move could reshape Senate strategy ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, where bipartisanship might become a political asset rather than a liability.