🌍 Introduction
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, former US President Donald Trump unveiled a bold new initiative he claims could redefine global peacemaking: the Board of Peace. Framed as a solution to decades of unresolved conflicts, the proposal has sparked intense global debate. Is this a genuine effort to bring lasting peace—or a move that could sideline the already struggling United Nations?
🏛️ What Is Trump’s Board of Peace?
The Board of Peace originated from US-led diplomatic efforts to end the Gaza conflict and was initially supported by a UN Security Council resolution. However, its scope has since expanded far beyond that single crisis.
According to leaked drafts of its charter, the Board would operate as a permanent global body, chaired for life by Donald Trump himself—even after leaving office. The chairman would wield sweeping powers, including selecting members, dissolving sub-groups, and appointing successors.
Permanent membership reportedly comes with a staggering price tag of $1 billion, raising concerns about exclusivity and influence.
⚖️ Power, Control, and Global Concerns
Critics argue that the structure of the Board concentrates unprecedented authority in the hands of one individual. Several European leaders and diplomats fear it could undermine existing international institutions, particularly the UN, by replacing collective decision-making with personalized power.
Some nations, including Sweden and Norway, have openly declined participation, citing unanswered legal and political questions. Others, like Slovenia, warned that the Board could “dangerously interfere with the global international order.”
🌐 Supporters vs Skeptics
While critics remain vocal, Trump has also attracted strong backing. Leaders from nearly 20 countries attended the launch in Davos, and more are reportedly considering joining. Some supporters view the Board as a practical response to the UN’s long-standing inability to resolve major conflicts due to Security Council deadlock.
Even seasoned UN insiders admit the organisation has struggled to keep pace with today’s geopolitical realities. The question is whether reform should come from within—or be replaced entirely.
🕊️ Can the Board Deliver Peace Where the UN Failed?
Trump claims his direct, forceful diplomacy has already helped secure ceasefires in multiple conflicts. However, many of these agreements have proven fragile or temporary. Experts warn that lasting peace requires broad international legitimacy, inclusion, and respect for international law—areas where the Board’s current framework appears weak.
Moreover, ongoing crises in Gaza, Ukraine, and elsewhere pose early and severe tests for the Board’s credibility.
🔮 What This Means for the Future of Global Diplomacy
The emergence of the Board of Peace comes at a pivotal moment, as discussions intensify around reforming the UN itself. Whether Trump’s initiative accelerates meaningful change or deepens global divisions remains uncertain.
What is clear is that the global peace architecture is under pressure—and the world is watching closely to see what comes next.